Pulitzer Prize Winning Tweets?

…Ted Koppel, Edward R. Murrow and Daniel Schorr Weigh In

Yesterday on CNN’s Reliable Sources, host Howard Kurtz found former ABC newsman Ted Koppel warning of the demise of the Fourth Estate, claiming that most media sources “are desperate to turn a buck,” and are “busy chasing popcorn rather than steak & potato news.” Citing widespread coverage of the Charlie Sheen meltdown, Koppel certainly had plenty of raw material to back up his claim that journalism was circling the drain, and to conclude that “in a democracy, an uniformed electorate is a great danger.” 

The Koppel interview caught my attention. I’ve long bemoaned the degradation of journalistic craftsmanship, having dealt with it on a first-hand basis. For example, I once asked a wire service reporter for his source related to an accusation against one of my clients, and his response to me was…a competing wire service. (Names withheld to avoid retribution.)

So with Koppel’s CNN appearance as my news hook, and armed with a backpack of my own PR war stories, I set out to research the journalistic craftsmanship topic, beginning with its patron saint: Edward R. Murrow. And that’s pretty much where my research, as well as my enthusiasm for blogging on the topic ended.

Here’s what Morrow had to say in 1958 in his “wires and lights” speech before the Radio and Television News Directors Association in Chicago, blasting TV’s emphasis on entertainment and commercialism at the expense of public interest: 

“During the daily peak viewing periods, television in the main insulates us from the realities of the world in which we live. If this state of affairs continues, we may alter an advertising slogan to read: Look now, pay later.”

Apparently, the demise of journalistic craftsmanship is a protracted affair, and something we shouldn’t fret over, or waste too many blog pixels writing about.

But there was an upside to exploration of the topic. My Edward R. Murrow research led me to check out one of his respected journalism compatriots, Daniel Schorr, who died last year at age 93. (Chain-smoker Morrow died at age 57.) A hard-nosed news reporter who covered the news until the day he died, Schorr posted his first message on Twitter in February 2009. In fact, there’s a neat video of Schorr’s introduction to Twitter on the NPR website.

If Twitter made sense to news veteran Daniel Schorr (who compared it to the Agora in ancient Greece), then Pulitzer Prize winning Tweets may someday be part of journalism’s future.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Four-String Craftmanship

“A chimpanzee could learn what I do physically. But it goes way beyond that. When you play, you play life.” 

 – Jaco Pastorius (1951 – 1987)

“It’s a continual thing. You’re never good enough. James Brown always instilled that in me…that you’re never good enough, no matter how much you’re chillin the audience, even if they’re fainting and sweating.”

– Bootsy Collins (1951 – )

— Regarded as one of the most influential bass players of all time, John “Jaco” Pastorius was inducted into the Down Beat Jazz Hall of Fame in 1988, one of only four bassists to be so honored (and the only electric bass guitarist).  — American funk music legend William “Bootsy” Collins rose to prominence as James Brown’s bassist. Founder and a professor at Funk University, he was inducted to the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame in 1977.

Bootsy Collins' Funk University

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Potential versus Achievement

“Craftsmanship entails learning to do one thing really well, while the ideal of the new economy is to be able to learn new things, celebrating potential rather than achievement.” 

— Matthew B. Crawford

 Shop Class As Soulcraft: An Inquiry Into The Value Of Work

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The Power of Intrinsic Selling

…and How Marketing Can Support Its Effectiveness

The most noteworthy article on the subject of B2B selling was published in a 1966 Harvard Business Review article (#66213). In “How to Buy /Sell Professional Services,” author Warren J. Wittreich explains the differences between extrinsic and intrinsic selling.

Extrinsic selling occurs, according to Wittreich, when a B2B seller relies on successful work that’s been performed for other customers, as a means to validate the seller’s capabilities and potential ability to perform for a prospective customer. The weakness of extrinsic selling is that it requires the prospective customer to make a leap of faith: to believe the service provider will provide a level of success that matches or exceeds the work performed for the seller’s past or current clients. Extrinsic selling is a “trust me” approach, employed by a great number of B2B product and service providers.

Conversely, intrinsic selling does not require a prospective client to base its selection of a seller based on work done for others. Instead, it engages the prospect in a meaningful dialogue that (1) addresses their specific situation; (2) demonstrates — on an immediate, first-hand basis — the seller’s understanding of that situation; and (3) validates the seller’s ability to help the potential buyer. Intrinsic selling provides buyers with a significantly higher level of confidence in the seller’s capabilities, and leads to an engagement or sale far more frequently and far more rapidly than extrinsic selling.

The B2B marketer’s task is to equip the sales force with methodologies and tools that help initiate and facilitate intrinsic selling. This is rarely accomplished through client / customer “case studies,” which are widely used, which prospective clients rarely read, and which carry the same level of credibility as references on a job applicant’s resume. (Would a company ever publish examples of its past work that were not portrayed as highly successful?)

Create Simple Tools to Engage Prospects

One example of Marketing Craftsmanship that leveraged the power of B2B intrinsic selling involved Phibro Energy’s introduction of energy derivatives…which enabled large companies to hedge price risk related to gasoline, jet fuel and heating oil. Phibro’s CEO Andy Hall understood that in order to capture the attention of CFOs of FORTUNE 500 companies, and to convince them that energy derivatives were a viable and prudent risk management strategy, his sales force would need to be equipped with more than fancy brochures. To be sold on the concept, a CFO would need to understand exactly how energy derivatives would benefit his company

To establish an intrinsic sales dynamic, Phibro Energy equipped its sales reps with a simple worksheet to be used in their face-to-face meetings with CFOs. The worksheet was designed to roughly calculate the range and depth of a large company’s energy price exposure. Based on past and projected volumes of jet fuel, gasoline, heating oil, etc. used by the prospective client, and by applying an algorithm created by Phibro’s in-house quants, the sales rep was able to show the CFO sitting across the table exactly how energy risk management would impact their company’s balance sheet.

Phibro’s energy exposure worksheet not only enabled their sales reps to establish an intrinsic sales dynamic, it immediately repositioned the sales rep’s role and stature. Having demonstrated Phibro Energy’s potential value in tangible terms, the sales rep was no longer viewed by the CFO as someone simply pushing products or services.  In the eyes of prospective clients, Phibro sales reps assumed a consultative role who could assist their company in reducing economic risk and in lowering operating costs.

Marketers at most B2B businesses, as well as many B2C firms, have similar opportunities to build disciplines and tools that can empower their sales reps to leverage the power of intrinsic selling. A major reason why these opportunities are not captured is that many marketers don’t understand the needs of the marketplace as well as their sales reps do…which is a blog topic for another day.

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

UCLA Coach John Wooden

“If you don’t have time to do it right, when will you have time to do it over?”

John Wooden’s teams won 10 NCAA Men’s Basketball Championships, including seven consecutive years from 1967 to 1973.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized